A Smart + Strong Site
Subscribe to:
E-newsletters
POZ magazine
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Back to home » Top Stories » CROI 2010
17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
CROI 2010 17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
Moscone Center West
San Francisco, CA
February 16-19, 2010

HIV in the Brain Usually Matches Levels in the Blood

February 24, 2010

By David Evans

People with undetectable HIV levels in the blood are also likely to have undetectable levels in the brain, according to a study presented February 19 at the 17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in San Francisco. However, the study doesn’t fully answer whether people living with HIV must be on antiretrovirals (ARV) that penetrate the central nervous system in order to prevent damage to the brain.

The study involved an analysis of data from the CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) study, which is following 1,562 people living with HIV who are at various stages of disease and who have different histories of ARV therapy use. CHARTER is exploring relationships between HIV and the central nervous system (CNS), and the study is being conducted at six research sites across the United States.

CHARTER researchers have also found that maintaining high CD4 cell counts is independently associated with a reduced risk of brain damage in people living with HIV. These results were also reported at CROI

Scott Letendre, MD, from the University of California in San Diego presented a study evaluating the relationship between HIV levels in the blood and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), along with the effects of ARV therapy.

Previous studies have suggested that the higher a person’s virus levels in the brain, the more likely he or she might be to suffer from problems with cognitive performance (for example, memory and concentration) and to have areas of visible brain damage on sophisticated scans. Because measuring virus levels in the CSF can be a complicated procedure, it is important to understand the relationship between what is happening with the virus in the blood and what is happening in the brain in order to rule out the need for more invasive testing. Exploring this relationship was a primary objective of Letendre’s study.

Viral Load in Blood and CSF

Letendre’s team analyzed data from 1,221 CHARTER participants who had viral load measurements in both blood and CSF. Roughly 31 percent of those participants were taking ARV therapy. The average age was 43, and 62 percent had a history of an AIDS diagnosis. The average lowest-ever (nadir) CD4 count was 175. Most people on ARV therapy had been on their current regimen for about one year, and 55 percent had undetectable HIV levels in their blood.

The factors that predicted whether a person would have detectable virus in the brain included older age, a higher viral load in blood, a lower current CD4 count and a lower CD4 nadir.

When Letendre and his colleagues limited their analysis to include only those taking ARV therapy, other factors became associated with having detectable HIV in CSF. They include a higher blood viral load level, non-white ethnicity and a CD4 count less than 200.

In both cases, whether on or off ARVs, virus levels in blood were strongly associated with virus levels in the CSF.

The Effect of ARVs

Letendre and others have previously estimated the degree to which various ARVs penetrate into the brain, called a central nervous system penetration effectiveness (CPE) score. CPE scores have been given to the individual ARVs, with a high score (4) demonstrating better penetration than a lower score (1). The combined CPE score of a regimen comes from adding the CPE scores of the individual drugs included in the regimen.

In this study, Letendre and his colleagues found that people with a high combined CPE score maintained better control of virus in their cerebrospinal fluid. For instance, 91 percent of people whose regimen had a high CPE score (9 or higher) maintained an undetectable viral load in the CSF, compared with just 57 percent of people with a CPE of 3 or less.

Examples of drugs known to penetrate the CNS well include Kaletra (lopinavir plus ritonavir), Viramune (nevirapine) and abacavir (found in Ziagen and Epzicom). Examples of drugs that do not penetrate the CNS well include tenofovir (found in Viread, Truvada and Atripla) and Viracept (nelfinavir).

Viral Load and Mental Functioning

Finally, Letendre reported on the impact of CSF viral load on psychoneurological performance, which measures aspects such as memory and concentration. When Letendre’s researchers looked at the contribution of CSF viral load, independent of anything else, they found that detectable virus in the CSF did not predict poorer psychoneurological performance.

This finding does not fully answer whether someone must be on an HIV treatment regimen containing CNS-penetrating ARVs to stave off potential brain damage caused by the virus. Other studies have questioned this theory.

If a person had detectable virus in the blood, however, and if HIV levels in the brain were as high as those in blood—or higher—he or she was more likely to see a decline in psychoneurological performance.

Letendre concluded by saying that measuring HIV in the blood gives a very good indication of what is happening in the brain. In other words, people with undetectable HIV in blood are likely to have undetectable virus in the CSF—and be better protected against signs and symptoms of brain damage—especially if they have maintained higher CD4 counts.

In people not taking ARVs, older age and low CD4s (both current and nadir) were associated with poorer control of virus in the CSF. In people who were taking ARVs, poor adherence, lower ARV brain penetration and non-white ethnicity were associated with higher viral loads in CSF.

Letendre cautioned, however, that the findings about age and ethnicity might be due to overlapping risk factors. For example, older people had usually been living with the virus for longer, and non-white participants were more likely to also be infected with hepatitis C.

Scroll down to comment on this story.

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The AIDSmeds team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include ":" "@" "<" ">" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

       

More from CROI 2010

HIV/AIDS Complications

March 9, 2010
HIV and the Brain: Part 2
March 8, 2010
Cancer Risks and HIV
HIV and the Brain: Part 1
March 1, 2010
HIV and Bone Health
February 25, 2010
Bone Fracture Risk Higher Among People Living With HIV
Vitamin D Deficiency Common Among HIV Positive
February 24, 2010
HIV in the Brain Usually Matches Levels in the Blood
Hep C Treatment Might Also Guard Against HIV Disease Progression
February 23, 2010
Truvada and Norvir-Boosted Reyataz More Likely to Cause Bone Loss in ACTG Study
Maintaining Higher CD4s Protects Against Brain Damage
February 20, 2010
HIV and Heart Disease Risks
February 19, 2010
Increased Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Linked to Tenofovir and Atazanavir
Non-AIDS Cancer Risk Decreases With Higher CD4 Cell Counts
Smoking Cessation Reduces Cardiovascular Disease Risk in HIV
February 18, 2010
H1N1 Meets HIV
HIV Contributes to Lung Cancer Risk, but Not Nearly as Much as Smoking

HIV Transmission and Prevention

March 8, 2010
HIV Prevention: On the Verge of Success?
HIV Treatment in Southern Africa
March 1, 2010
One in Six New HIV Cases Involves Drug-Resistant Virus
February 22, 2010
Routine HIV Testing Proving Successful in Washington, DC
Testing and Treatment Tied to Fewer New HIV Cases in S.F. & Vancouver Studies

Starting and Switching Treatment

March 2, 2010
Normal Life Expectancy With Maintenance of CD4s Above 500
February 22, 2010
Testing and Treatment Tied to Fewer New HIV Cases in S.F. & Vancouver Studies
February 19, 2010
No Efficacy Differences in ACTG Study Comparing Sustiva or Reyataz with either Epzicom or Truvada
February 18, 2010
Once-Daily Prezista Effective, Safer for HIV Treatment-Experienced Patients

Experimental HIV Drugs

March 9, 2010
New Treatments for HIV: Part 1
New Treatments for HIV: Part 2
February 18, 2010
New CCR5 Antagonist Shows Promise in Early Study
Vicriviroc Falls Short in Treatment-Experienced HIV Studies
February 17, 2010
Quad Pill and Boosting Drug Show Well in Studies


[ about AIDSmeds | AIDSmeds advisory board | our staff | advertising policy | advertise/contact us]
© 2012 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.