A Smart + Strong Site
Subscribe to:
E-newsletters
POZ magazine
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Back to home » Top Stories » ICAAC/IDSA 2008
ICAAC/IDSA 2008 48th ICAAC/IDSA 46th Annual Meeting
Washington, DC
October 25-28, 2008

PRO 140 Has Long-Lasting Activity Against HIV

October 28, 2008

By Tim Horn

Positive early results from a Phase II clinical trial of intravenous (IV) PRO 140, an experimental HIV entry inhibitor, were reported October 26 at the 2008 joint meeting of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA). Separately, Progenics Pharmaceuticals announced this week encouraging results from a study evaluating a much more user-friendly subcutaneous (SC) formulation of PRO 140.

PRO 140 is a laboratory-made antibody that binds to a protein on the CCR5 membrane of CD4 cells. Once PRO 140 does this, HIV cannot successfully bind with the surface of CD4s; thus the virus is prevented from infecting healthy cells.

While Pfizer’s Selzentry (maraviroc) works differently from PRO 140, both drugs target CCR5 and are considered HIV entry inhibitors.

The Phase II study reported at ICAAC/IDSA by Jeffrey Jacobson, MD, of Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia evaluated IV PRO 140 in HIV-positive patients who had not taken any antiretrovirals (ARVs) for at least three months before enrollment. Using tropism testing, all study volunteers were required to have HIV that uses the CCR5 co-receptor to enter CD4 cells; patients with virus that uses another co-receptor called CXCR4 were excluded.

The 31 patients enrolled were monitored for 58 days following a single-dose infusion of placebo or one of two doses of PRO 140 (either 5 or 10 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg] of body weight). The average viral load upon study entry was 35,000 copies; the average CD4 count at the start of the study was 403 cells.

The interim analysis reported by Dr. Jacobson involved the first 15 patients treated in the study, with five patients randomized to each of the three groups.

In the 5 mg/kg group, the average maximum viral load drop was 1.9 log—very similar to the results of a Phase Ib study reported in July 2007. In the 10 mg/kg group, the average maximum viral load drop was 2.17 log. These reductions in viral load, compared with a 0.5 log drop in the placebo group, were statistically significant, meaning that the differences were too large to have occurred by chance.

As was seen in earlier studies, PRO 140 continued to work against HIV long after single-infusion therapy. In the 10 mg/kg group, for example, viral loads remained an average of 1.55 log below their pre-treatment levels.

IV administration of PRO 140 was “generally well tolerated” compared with placebo infusions. According to Jacobson, there were no serious drug-related side effects.

Progenics has developed an SC injection version of PRO 140. According to the company, a recently completed proof-of-concept study reports that five patients who used once-weekly injections of the drug, at a dose of 324 mg, experienced a maximum average viral load reductions of 1.77 log.

Scroll down to comment on this story.

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The AIDSmeds team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include ":" "@" "<" ">" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

       

More from ICAAC/IDSA 2008

Starting and Switching Treatment

November 4, 2008
HIV News at ICAAC/IDSA - Part 1
HIV News at ICAAC/IDSA - Part 2
November 3, 2008
Truvada vs. Epzicom: The Debate Goes On
October 30, 2008
Long-Term Benefits and Risks of Kaletra Monotherapy Explored in Two Studies
October 28, 2008
Greater HIV Response to Prezista vs. Kaletra for First-Timers Over 96 Weeks
Higher Response Rate with Norvir-Boosted Reyataz vs. Kaletra as First-Line Therapy
October 27, 2008
Isentress Comparable to Sustiva for First-Time Treatment
Selzentry Reanalysis Shows Potential as First-Line Treatment
Should ARV Treatment Be Started When CD4s Fall Below 500?

HIV/AIDS Complications

November 4, 2008
Drug-Resistant Staph: Growing Concern Among People With HIV
High Number of Pulmonary Hypertension Cases in Naval HIV Cohort Study
Drug-Resistant Staph and HIV - Part 1
Drug-Resistant Staph and HIV - Part 2

Experimental HIV Drugs

October 28, 2008
PRO 140 Has Long-Lasting Activity Against HIV
New NNRTI Called RDEA806 Shows Promise

HIV Transmission and Prevention

October 29, 2008
Has HIV Evolved to Become More Dangerous?


[ about AIDSmeds | AIDSmeds advisory board | our staff | advertising policy | advertise/contact us]
© 2012 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.