Back to home » Top Stories » IAC 2010
XVIII International AIDS Conference
IAC 2010 XVIII International AIDS Conference
Reed Messe Wien
Vienna, Austria
July 18-23, 2010

emailprint

Viramune Boosts Hep C Treatment Efficacy in People With HIV

July 20, 2010

By Tim Horn

People coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) who receive Viramune (nevirapine) may respond better to pegylated interferon/ribavirin HCV treatment compared with those receiving Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir), according to a retrospective study reported Tuesday, July 20, at the XVIII International AIDS Conference in Vienna.

It is known that some nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors—such as didanosine (Videx EC), zidovudine (found in Retrovir, Combivir and Trizivir) and abacavir (found in Ziagen, Epzicom and Trizivir)—may decrease the efficacy and tolerability of HCV therapy. This is likely due to different interactions and toxicities, explained Jose Mira, MD, of the Hospital Universitario de Valme in Seville, Spain.

The information about whether protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors influence sustained virologic responses (SVRs) to HCV therapy—defined as undetectable HCV levels six months after discontinuing treatment—among coinfected patients is limited and contradictory.

According to Mira, the use of protease inhibitors during HCV therapy led to a worse rate of response to pegylated interferon/ribavirin—the standard treatment for HCV—in a previous clinical trial. However, this association was not found in other studies performed in populations of coinfected patients.

It has also been reported that patients receiving Viramune-based antiretroviral (ARV) therapy show lower HCV viral loads than those treated with regimens containing a protease inhibitor or Sustiva (efavirenz). This finding, Mira added, could have a positive influence on the response to HCV therapy among individuals taking Viramune.

Based on these observations, Mira’s group decided to compare the efficacy of pegylated interferon/ribavirin among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients taking either Viramune- or Kaletra-based ARV regimens. This wasn’t an actual clinical trial, but rather a retrospective review of coinfected patients taking either ARV, along with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, at one of 20 hospitals throughout Spain.

The review included 165 patients, averaging 42 years old. Seventy-one patients were treated with Viramune, and 94 were treated with Kaletra.

It’s important to note that there were imbalances in the study population. The proportion of patients who were either male or had advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis was higher among individuals who took Kaletra. On the other hand, the percentage of patients with low levels of pre-HCV treatment viral loads was greater in the Viramune group.

In the strict intention-to-treat analysis, 56 percent of patients treated with Viramune experienced SVRs, compared with 37 percent of those receiving Kaletra.  Among those with HCV genotypes 1 and 4—the most difficult to treat forms of HCV—the results were 43 versus 25 percent, respectively. Among those with easier to treat genotypes 2 and 3, the results were 78 versus 59 percent, respectively. These differences, Mira reported, were statistically significant, meaning they were all too great to have occurred by chance.

Eight percent of the patients in the Viramune group, compared with 23 percent of patients in the Kaletra group, were HCV treatment non-responders. This difference was statistically significant. 

However, the differences in the rates of relapse, HCV viral load breakthrough, discontinuations due to adverse events and voluntary dropout were similar in both groups.

Because both groups were different regarding baseline HCV viral loads and fibrosis state, Mira’s group analyzed SVR rates by stratifying the population according to these important parameters. Among patients with high HCV viral loads (600,000 copies or greater), 58 percent of those who were receiving Viramune, compared with 31 percent of those taking Kaletra, experienced an SVR. Among patients with advanced fibrosis (a score of F3 or F4), 60 percent of the subjects in the Viramune group, compared with 36 percent of patients in the Kaletra group, achieved an SVR.

Upon analyzing the data for the specific factors associated with an SVR, the following were found to be positive variables: HCV genotype 2 or 3, use of ARV therapy including Viramune, and greater than 80 percent adherence to HCV treatment.

In conclusion, Mira stressed that controlled clinical trials are warranted to confirm the positive effects of Viramune on the efficacy of HCV therapy in people living with HIV.

Search: Viramune, nevirapine, hepatitis C, HCV, pegylated interferon, ribavirin, treatment, Kaletra, lopinavir

Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The AIDSmeds team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include ":" "@" "<" ">" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

More from AIDS2010

HIV/AIDS Complications

July 28, 2010
Global Survey: Stigma, Isolation and Discrimination Still Pervasive
Universal HIV Treatment Access No Guarantee of Health for Socially Disadvantaged
July 27, 2010
OM-85 BV: A Bacterial Vaccine Against Respiratory Problems in People with HIV and COPD?
Low Vitamin D Levels Not Associated With HIV Drugs
July 23, 2010
Longer Duration of HIV Infection Might Increase the Risk of Brain Disorders
Nearly 75 Percent of People With HIV Might Have Bone Problems
July 22, 2010
Health Care Providers and People With HIV Not Communicating Effectively
July 21, 2010
Non-AIDS Cancers Occurring at Earlier Age Among People With HIV
Hep C Treatment Effective in HIV Patients With Normal Liver Enzymes
Aging Might Have a Smaller Impact on Immune Function Than Suspected
July 20, 2010
Viramune Boosts Hep C Treatment Efficacy in People With HIV
HIV/HCV Coinfection Further Increases Risk of Bone Fractures
Fewer Malignancies Seen in Those Taking Selzentry

Experimental HIV Drugs

July 23, 2010
More Details of TBR-652’s Antiviral and Anti-Inflammatory Potential Reported
July 22, 2010
ViiV HIV Integrase Inhibitor Performing Well in First-Time Treatment Study
Rilpivirine Has Similar Efficacy and Better Tolerability Than Sustiva
Extended-Release Viramune Has Comparable Safety and Efficacy to Standard Viramune
July 20, 2010
New ViiV Integrase Inhibitor Effective Against Some Isentress-Resistant HIV Strains
July 19, 2010
Argos’s Dendritic Cell Therapy Reduces HIV During Treatment Interruption

HIV Transmission and Prevention

July 29, 2010
Prevention Is Failing to Target MSM When They’re Young Enough
July 26, 2010
HPV Cancer Vaccine Effective for Heterosexual, Gay and Bisexual Men
Study Finds PrEP Is Safe in Gay and Bi Men
July 23, 2010
Circumcision Unlikely to Have Major HIV Prevention Benefit Among Gay Men
July 21, 2010
Microbicide Success Story: What It Means and Where We Go Next
MACS: Childhood Sex Abuse and Victimization Linked to Increased HIV Risk
Full-Scale HIV Treatment and Prevention Could Save Millions of Lives
July 20, 2010
Tenofovir Microbicidal Gel Significantly Cuts HIV Infection Rate
HIV Cases in Young People Are Falling Around the World
July 19, 2010
Preliminary Results Suggest Good Safety and Adherence Profile for PrEP

Starting and Switching Treatment

July 22, 2010
Reyataz/Isentress Combo Spares Norvir and Nukes, But Is Integrase Resistance a Concern?
Possibly No Survival Benefit to Starting HIV Treatment at CD4s of 500 or More
Once-Daily Prezista/Norvir Monotherapy Largely Effective Over 96 Weeks
Abacavir/Lamivudine Equivalent to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Canadian Cohort Study
July 19, 2010
Strategies for a Cure Reviewed in Vienna
Kaletra/Isentress Shows Promise as HIV Nuceleoside-Sparing Regimen for First-Line Treatment
Switch From Sustiva to Intelence Reduces Central Nervous System Side Effects
Protease Inhibitor-to-Isentress Switch is Effective, Lipid Friendly

Global HIV/AIDS

July 22, 2010
Health Care Providers and People With HIV Not Communicating Effectively
July 20, 2010
Tenofovir Microbicidal Gel Significantly Cuts HIV Infection Rate
5.2 Million People With HIV in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Now on Treatment
At Least 31 Countries Deporting People Living With HIV
HIV Cases in Young People Are Falling Around the World


[ about AIDSmeds | AIDSmeds advisory board | our staff | advertising policy | advertise/contact us]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.