Back to home » Top Stories » IAC 2010
XVIII International AIDS Conference
IAC 2010 XVIII International AIDS Conference
Reed Messe Wien
Vienna, Austria
July 18-23, 2010

emailprint

Protease Inhibitor-to-Isentress Switch is Effective, Lipid Friendly

July 19, 2010

By Tim Horn

Replacing a Norvir (ritonavir)–boosted protease inhibitor with Isentress (raltegravir) may be an effective option—with improvements in blood lipid levels—for HIV-positive individuals with undetectable viral loads, according to the results of two Spanish studies reported Monday, July 19, at the XVIII International AIDS Conference in Vienna.

One study indicated that it may even be possible to switch to once-daily dosing of Isentress, as opposed to the standard twice-daily dosing of the drug, while also warning that switches from a Norvir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) to Isentress—either once or twice a day—may only be suitable for patients who don’t have a history of resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).

As was noted by Jose Gattell, MD, of the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, who presented the results of the SPIRAL study on behalf of his colleagues, Norvir-boosted PI-based therapy has been associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease due, at least in part, to lipid effects. Isentress, Gattell pointed out, may show a better lipid profile, all the while being as effective as Norvir-boosted PI-based therapy in selected patients.

Eugenia Vispo, MD, of the Hospital Carlos III in Madrid, who presented data from the ODIS study, went one step further. Not only has Isentress demonstrated good antiviral activity and safety when dosed twice-daily, but its long intracellular half-life—concentrations of the drug remain elevated inside cells for several hours—might allow once-daily administration of Isentress among those switching to the drug from a Norvir-boosted PI.

The SPIRAL Study

The SPIRAL study enrolled 282 people living with HIV, all of whom were on a Norvir-boosted PI plus two other antiretrovirals (ARVs) for at least six months and had an undetectable viral load for at least 180 days. Of these patients, 142 switched their Norvir-boosted PI for Isentress (400 mg taken twice daily), and 134 patients remained on their pre-study regimen.

The primary measurement of the study was the percentage of patients free of treatment failure, for any reason, through 48 weeks of follow-up. Treatment failure was defined as virologic rebound (two consecutive viral loads above 50 copies), discontinuation of study therapy, disease progression or death. A secondary measure of the study was the proportion of patients with virologic failure at or before week 48 (the first of two consecutive viral loads above 50 copies at least two weeks apart).

Patients entering the study were, on average, 45 years old. Nineteen percent of those in the Isentress group were female, compared with 28 percent of those who continued Norvir-boosted PI therapy. Most patients entered the study using either Kaletra (lopinavir plus ritonavir) or Norvir-boosted Reyataz (atazanavir), with either Truvada (tenofovir plus emtricitabine) or Epzicom (abacavir plus lamivudine).

Before enrolling in the study, patients had been on an average of five ARV regimens. Thirty-eight percent had a history of virologic failure using previous regimens.

Eight-nine percent of those who switched to Isentress were free of treatment failure through week 48 of the study, compared with 87 percent of those who remained on Norvir-boosted PI therapy. As for virologic failure, this was avoided by 97 percent of those who switched to Isentress, compared with 95 percent of those who remained on Norvir-boosted PI treatment.

The average change in CD4 counts was similar in both groups. There was a 46-CD4 cell gain in the Isentress group and a 44-CD4 cell gain among those who remained on their Norvir-boosted PIs.

Adverse events, leading to study drug discontinuation, occurred in 2 percent of patients in both groups. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 percent of patients in both groups.

Of note, there were significant differences in blood lipid changes through week 48 of the study. Total cholesterol, for example, decreased by 11 percent in the Isentress group, compared with a 1.82 percent increase among those in the PI-treated group. Similarly, triglycerides decreased by nearly 21 percent in the Isentress group, compared with a 4.72 percent gain in the PI group. These differences were statistically significant, meaning they were too great to have occurred by chance.

The ODIS Trial

In the ODIS trial, Vispo’s group randomized 311 patients to receive either twice-daily (73 patients) or once-daily (149 patients) Isentress, instead of their previously prescribed PI, after maintaining an undetectable viral load for at least six months. What’s more, patients randomized to twice-daily Isentress who maintained an undetectable load for three months in the study were randomized again to either continue twice-daily dosing (35 patients) or switch to once-daily Isentress (38 patients).

The average age upon entering the study was 46 years. About 67 percent were male. The study volunteers had been receiving ARV therapy for an average of 101 months before entering the trial; 68 percent had a history of virologic failure; and 33 percent had a history of NRTI resistance. As with the SPIRAL study, almost all patients were on either Truvada or Epzicom upon entering the trial.

About 6 percent of the patients in the study experienced virologic failure—a rebound in viral load—after switching their PIs for Isentress. Among those in the once-daily Isentress group, 6.4 percent experienced virologic failure, compared with 2.9 percent of those in the twice-daily Isentress group. This difference, however, was not statistically significant.

As for those with prior virologic failure, the overall rate of virologic failure in ODIS was 8 percent. Among those in the once-daily Isentress group with a history of virologic failure, the rate was 8.7 percent. Among those in the twice-daily Isentress group with a history of virologic failure, the rate was 4.3 percent. Here, too, the difference was too small to be statistically significant.

There was, however, a statistically significant difference when looking at those with a history of previous NRTI resistance. Among those in the once-daily Isentress group with a history of NRTI resistance, 17.7 percent experienced virologic failure within 48 weeks of switching. Among those in the twice-daily Isentress group with a history of NRTI resistance, virologic failure occurred in 8.3 percent within 48 weeks of switching.

As was seen in SPIRAL, reductions in lipid levels were documented in ODIS.

In his conclusion of the SPIRAL study, Gattell remarked that, in patients with sustained virologic suppression on a Norvir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimen, switching to Isentress demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and resulted in a better lipid profile.

Though the ODIS study lacked a control group involving patients who remained on a PI-based regimen for comparison purposes, Vispo also said that a switch from PIs to Isentress among people with undetectable viral loads effectively sustains viral suppression—as long as NRTI resistance has not be documented in the past. In this setting, she said, the efficacy of Isentress may not differ between providing the drug twice daily or once daily.

Search: protease inhibitor, Isentress, raltegravir, Kaletra, Reyataz, atazanavir, switch, lipids, safety, efficacy, Vienna, International AIDS Conference, Gattell, Vispo

Scroll down to comment on this story.



Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The AIDSmeds team reviews all comments before they are posted. Please do not include ":" "@" "<" ">" in your comment. The opinions expressed by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong, which is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by people providing comments.)

Comments require captcha.
Please enter this number for verification:

| Posting Rules



Show comments (0 total)

More from AIDS2010

HIV/AIDS Complications

July 28, 2010
Global Survey: Stigma, Isolation and Discrimination Still Pervasive
Universal HIV Treatment Access No Guarantee of Health for Socially Disadvantaged
July 27, 2010
OM-85 BV: A Bacterial Vaccine Against Respiratory Problems in People with HIV and COPD?
Low Vitamin D Levels Not Associated With HIV Drugs
July 23, 2010
Longer Duration of HIV Infection Might Increase the Risk of Brain Disorders
Nearly 75 Percent of People With HIV Might Have Bone Problems
July 22, 2010
Health Care Providers and People With HIV Not Communicating Effectively
July 21, 2010
Non-AIDS Cancers Occurring at Earlier Age Among People With HIV
Hep C Treatment Effective in HIV Patients With Normal Liver Enzymes
Aging Might Have a Smaller Impact on Immune Function Than Suspected
July 20, 2010
Viramune Boosts Hep C Treatment Efficacy in People With HIV
HIV/HCV Coinfection Further Increases Risk of Bone Fractures
Fewer Malignancies Seen in Those Taking Selzentry

Experimental HIV Drugs

July 23, 2010
More Details of TBR-652’s Antiviral and Anti-Inflammatory Potential Reported
July 22, 2010
ViiV HIV Integrase Inhibitor Performing Well in First-Time Treatment Study
Rilpivirine Has Similar Efficacy and Better Tolerability Than Sustiva
Extended-Release Viramune Has Comparable Safety and Efficacy to Standard Viramune
July 20, 2010
New ViiV Integrase Inhibitor Effective Against Some Isentress-Resistant HIV Strains
July 19, 2010
Argos’s Dendritic Cell Therapy Reduces HIV During Treatment Interruption

HIV Transmission and Prevention

July 29, 2010
Prevention Is Failing to Target MSM When They’re Young Enough
July 26, 2010
HPV Cancer Vaccine Effective for Heterosexual, Gay and Bisexual Men
Study Finds PrEP Is Safe in Gay and Bi Men
July 23, 2010
Circumcision Unlikely to Have Major HIV Prevention Benefit Among Gay Men
July 21, 2010
Microbicide Success Story: What It Means and Where We Go Next
MACS: Childhood Sex Abuse and Victimization Linked to Increased HIV Risk
Full-Scale HIV Treatment and Prevention Could Save Millions of Lives
July 20, 2010
Tenofovir Microbicidal Gel Significantly Cuts HIV Infection Rate
HIV Cases in Young People Are Falling Around the World
July 19, 2010
Preliminary Results Suggest Good Safety and Adherence Profile for PrEP

Starting and Switching Treatment

July 22, 2010
Reyataz/Isentress Combo Spares Norvir and Nukes, But Is Integrase Resistance a Concern?
Possibly No Survival Benefit to Starting HIV Treatment at CD4s of 500 or More
Once-Daily Prezista/Norvir Monotherapy Largely Effective Over 96 Weeks
Abacavir/Lamivudine Equivalent to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Canadian Cohort Study
July 19, 2010
Strategies for a Cure Reviewed in Vienna
Kaletra/Isentress Shows Promise as HIV Nuceleoside-Sparing Regimen for First-Line Treatment
Switch From Sustiva to Intelence Reduces Central Nervous System Side Effects
Protease Inhibitor-to-Isentress Switch is Effective, Lipid Friendly

Global HIV/AIDS

July 22, 2010
Health Care Providers and People With HIV Not Communicating Effectively
July 20, 2010
Tenofovir Microbicidal Gel Significantly Cuts HIV Infection Rate
5.2 Million People With HIV in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Now on Treatment
At Least 31 Countries Deporting People Living With HIV
HIV Cases in Young People Are Falling Around the World


[ about AIDSmeds | AIDSmeds advisory board | our staff | advertising policy | advertise/contact us]
© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy.
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.